Our Impact
- Consultant Success Stories
- Student Success Stories
- Testimonials
During 2017-2018, I worked on two research projects and submitted two research papers. During the process, I actively used Writing Hub Grad Consultation Appointments. The Grad Consultants are so professional. They have actively helped me not only with grammar errors but also with the information flows and professional logics for my research papers.
Because the Grad Consultants are also PhD students, they encouraged me a lot to finish these writing projects and helped me improve my writing. Moreover, they enjoy reading and writing a lot, so they actively provided their experiences regarding how to organize and improve the writing, and I got a sense of how to improve my writing by myself. I do appreciate their kind words, consideration, and help. After several appointments for fine-tuning, I submitted my research papers, and both were accepted individually.
-- Eunjeong Koh, Doctoral Student, Music
I want to thank the Writing Hub for the Writing Room you have been hosting. Thanks to these sessions, and now that my results are in, I have been able to write my paper quickly, painlessly, and more confidently because I have been laying the ground work for it all quarter. I have also been more efficient throughout the quarter by integrating writing into my research in a more regular way.
-- Viktoria Gisladottir, Ph.D. Graduate, Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Thank you for creating a space and time that I could write my dissertation. I successfully defended my dissertation a few weeks ago, and it would not have been possible without the techniques that I learned from the Writing Workshops and the opportunity to work in the Grad Writing Room in the morning. I included the Writing Hub in the acknowledgements of my dissertation, but in reviewing my dissertation one last time before my final submission I wanted to send a note to say thank you.
-- Suzanne Dunai, Ph.D. Graduate, History
In preparation for my qualifying exam I attended several of the Graduate Student Writing Retreats offered by The Writing Hub. These programs have been absolutely essential for my success this past year, and for getting me closer to a more sustainable writing habit. During my second and third years in the anthropology program, I struggled to complete my Master’s thesis. Completing my thesis took much longer than I anticipated as I was wrestling with how to go about working on such a large project.
The graduate student writing retreats were pivotal in helping change my relationship with writing, with my project, and ultimately with my place in academia. It’s still an ongoing learning process, of course, but I feel very differently about my work now than I did even just a year ago. I actually enjoy writing most of the time and therefore enjoy my project so much more. The community the writing retreats offered helped to improve my external accountability as well as to disrupt the silence I’ve felt in graduate school around the difficulties (and even joys!) of the writing process. The retreats gave me the tools to be mindful about the negative self-talk and mental loopholes I utilized to keep me avoiding my projects. The writing process is very personal, and the retreats offered introspection coupled with a healthy dose of motivation that kept us productive and happy.
The graduate student writing retreats and other grad writing programs have been essential for my success thus far, and I know they have made an important impact on many of my colleagues who have also utilized these resources.
-- Belinda Ramirez, Ph.D. Candidate, Anthropology
As an educator, I feel like I have received training [through the Writing Hub] that I so much needed to effectively and successfully incorporate a writing component in my classes. There are two aspects that I feel I have begun to learn in participating in the program and interacting with Matthew and Erica. The first one is how to construct effective writing assignments, the second is how to provide effective feedback to the students on their writing.
Upon my return at UCSD in the Fall of 2017 I set out to design a new upper elective class on data analysis in macroeconomics. Since the beginning, my idea was to have a class that had a strong analytical and numerical component (i.e. what statistical tools do I apply to the data, why, and how), and, at the same time, a strong writing component (i.e. now that I have the numerical results, how do I communicate how and why they are interesting and relevant?). Students seemed to respond well to the analytical and numerical component, but I often sensed frustration on their part in dealing with the two writing assignments during the quarter. It is in this context that I jumped enthusiastically at the opportunity to improve my skills by taking part in the Writing [Hub’s] Program in [Spring 2019].
The first impact that the program had on my teaching was to make me think about how to construct a writing assignment by first clarifying to myself what transferable skills and knowledge the students should use and improve by working on the assignment, and then clarifying it in the assignment’s directions. I have also learned how much more effectively students respond to specific and clear directions, as opposed to general and vague directions. More importantly, I have seen the evidence of the effectiveness in the quality of the students’ assignments. In Spring 2019 the overall quality of the writing assignments has been much higher than all the previous times I taught the class.
The second impact that the program had on my teaching was to make me think about how to provide good and effective feedback on the writing assignments. Grading writing assignments is for me a great challenge because of the number and types of comments that one can, in principle, provide. I often find myself providing feedback on a fundamental aspect of the writing next to a comment on grammar. Through the program I have learned how important it is to prioritize, to start from what is working in the writing in order to address what is not working, to have a set rubric with a few dimensions for evaluations. Having a more structured approach to evaluating writing assignments has turned grading papers into a more enjoyable experience – as much enjoyable as grading can be, of course. More importantly, I have noticed that students responded to my comments, both by asking me to discuss them more thoroughly in office meetings, and/or by incorporating them in their second writing assignments.
Overall, after participating in the program, I feel that I have acquired several critical tools that have permanently changed my approach to the use of writing assignments in my classes.
-- Giacomo Rondina, Associate Teaching Professor, Economics